INTRODUCTION
This article describes the advantages and disadvantages of
the different methods of measuring hematocrit by discussing the
following:
- The components of whole blood
- Indications for measuring hematocrit
- Measuring technologies
1. Microhematocrit
2. Complete blood cell count
3. Conductivity on blood gas analyzers
4. Calculation of hematocrit
- Comparison of the different technologies
This article will be followed by another article describing the
different methods of determining hemoglobin.
THE COMPONENTS OF WHOLE BLOOD
Whole blood is comprised of erythrocytes (the red blood cells or
RBCs involved in oxygen transport), platelets and leukocytes (the
white blood cells or WBCs involved in the body's immune defense).
The cells are suspended in the aqueous medium of plasma. In blood
from healthy individuals, erythrocytes constitute the vast majority
of cells; the erythrocytes contain hemoglobin (Hb), which gives
blood its red color and which has oxygen-binding abilities. Plasma
mainly consists of water (approx. 93 %) but also of salts, various
proteins and lipids as well as other constituents, e.g. glucose.

FIG. 1. A centrifugated whole-blood sample
The definition of hematocrit (hemato from the Greek haima =
blood; crit from the Greek krinein = to separate) is the ratio of
the volume of packed red blood cells to the total blood volume and
is therefore also known as the packed cell volume, or PCV. The
hematocrit is reported as a percentage or a ratio. In healthy adult
individuals the red blood cells constitute approx. 40-48 %, whereas
newborns may have hematocrits of up to 60 % [1]. The layer between
the RBCs and plasma, the buffy coat layer, constitutes approx. 1 %.
It consists of WBCs and platelets and should therefore not be
calculated as part of the packed cell volume.
The relationship between hematocrit and hemoglobin
The following is a summary of the quantities/abbreviations that are
relevant when discussing hematocrit:
- Hct: Hematocrit (% or volume fraction)
- ctHb: Concentration of total hemoglobin (g/dL, g/L or
mmol/L)
- RBC: Red blood cell (erythrocyte) (× 1012/L)
- MCV: Mean cell volume (fL)
- MCHC: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (%, g/L or
mmol/L)
In normal conditions there is a linear relationship between
hematocrit and the concentration of hemoglobin (ctHb). An
empirical study [2] has shown that the relationship can be expressed
as follows:
| Hct (%) =
(0.0485 × ctHb (mmol/L) + 0.0083) × 100 |
Hematocrit can also be estimated from measurements of the mean
cell volume (MCV) or the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC):
| Hct (%) = MCV × RBC
× 0.1 |
Hct (%) =
ctHb × 100
MCHC |
INDICATIONS FOR MEASURING HEMATOCRIT
Hematocrit measurements may be requested when it is suspected that a
patient is anemic or suffering from dehydration, bleeding or other
medical and surgical conditions.
Low hematocrit
A low hematocrit reflects a low number of circulating red
blood cells and is an indicator of a decrease in the oxygen-carrying
capacity or of overhydration. Examples of conditions causing a low
hematocrit (anemia) include [3]:
- Internal or external hemorrhage – bleeding
- Complication of chronic renal failure – kidney disease
- Pernicious anemia – vitamin-B12 deficiency
- Hemolysis – associated with transfusion reactions
A low hematocrit may be found in autoimmune diseases and
bone-marrow failures.
High hematocrit
A high hematocrit may reflect an absolute increase in the number of
erythrocytes, or a decrease in plasma volume, in conditions such as
[3]:
- Severe dehydration – e.g. in case of burns, diarrhea or
excessive use of diuretics
- Erythrocytosis – excessive red blood cell production
- Polycythemia vera – abnormal increase of blood cells
- Hemachromatosis – an inherited iron metabolism disorder
High hematocrit is also used as an indicator of the excessive
intake of exogenous erythropoitin (EPO), which stimulates the
production of red blood cells. Athletes can artificially improve
their performance by enhancing the oxygen-carrying capacity with EPO.
In newborns and especially premature babies, high hematocrit
values are common. The hematocrit of infants reaches the level of
adult hematocrit by approx. three months of age [1].
The conditions leading to low hematocrit values, e.g. hemorrhage,
often require continuous measurements of the hematocrit and fast
decisions concerning transfusions. If the hematocrit is measured
immediately after an acute hemorrhage, the value will be normal
until the decreased blood volume is corrected by fluid shifts into
the blood vessels.
MEASURING TECHNOLOGIES
This section gives a technical description of the most commonly used
techniques for measuring hematocrit:
- The determination of hematocrit by means of centrifugation
- The calculation of hematocrit from the complete blood cell
count (CBC)
- The determination of hematocrit by conductivity
- The calculation of hematocrit from ctHb
1. Microhematocrit
The reference method recommended by NCCLS of determining
hematocrit or packed cell volume (PCV) is centrifugation.
Method [4]:
Hematocrit (PCV) is the measure of the ratio of the volume
occupied by the red blood cells to the volume of whole blood. The
blood sample is drawn into a capillary and centrifugated, and then
the ratio can be measured and expressed as a decimal or percentage
fraction.
Materials:
- Whole blood from a freely flowing skin puncture or
anticoagulated (EDTA or heparin) venous or arterial blood
- Glass capillary tubes with a narrow diameter
- Sealing compound (if the capillaries are not self-sealing)
- A microhematocrit centrifuge with a maximum relative
centrifugal force of 10-15,000 × g, which should be reached within
30 seconds [4]
- Graphic reading device
Procedure:
- Capillary tubes are filled by capillary forces. A minimum of
two capillaries is required to ensure balance in the centrifuge.
It is important that the tubes are sealed thoroughly.
- After five minutes of centrifugation the hematocrit can be
measured while the tubes are still kept in a horizontal position.
A distinct column of packed erythrocytes is visible in one end of
the capillary tube (Fig. 2). The packed erythrocytes are followed
by first a small turbid layer – the buffy coat layer – and then a
clear column of plasma (Fig. 2). Hematocrit is estimated by
calculating the ratio of the column of packed erythrocytes to the
total length of the sample in the capillary tube, measured with a
graphic reading device.
- The measurement should be performed within 10 minutes to avoid
merging of the layers.

FIG. 2. Reading the hematocrit
Limitations:
- Studies have shown that spun hematocrit gives values approx.
1.5-3.0 % too high due to plasma trapped in the RBC layer. If
abnormal types of RBCs are present, this bias can be even greater,
as more plasma is trapped [5]. See also Table I.
2. Complete blood cell count (CBC)
In hematology laboratories, automatic cell count analyzers
measuring multiple parameters are the most commonly used.
Method:
The hematocrit is determined indirectly from the average size
and number of RBCs. The reference method is the Coulter impedance
principle [6] and is described below.
Materials:
- Sample tubes normally containing 3-5 mL EDTA anticoagulated
blood
Procedure:
- The whole-blood sample is diluted automatically with an
isotonic solution prior to analysis.
- The diluted blood is forced through an orifice which has two
electrodes placed on opposite sides (Fig. 3).
- By applying a constant current between the two electrodes, the
impedance is constant until a blood cell passes through the
orifice
- Due to the non-conductive properties of the red blood cell
membrane, the electrical resistance increases each time an
erythrocyte passes through the orifice.
- The change in potential between the electrodes correlates to
the volume of the passing erythrocyte. Furthermore, erythrocytes
that have passed through the orifice are counted. From the mean
cell volume, the erythrocyte count and the dilution factor, the
hematocrit is derived.

FIG. 3. The Coulter principle
Limitations:
- When a high reticulocyte or WBC count is present, hematocrit
determinations using hematology analyzers can result in the
calculation of falsely elevated values, because the higher cell
volumes of these cells will interfere with the red blood cell
count and the calculation of the hematocrit [7]. See also Table I.
3. Conductivity on blood gas analyzers
In POCT, blood gas analyzers measuring multiple STAT
parameters are often used. Some blood gas analyzers determine
hematocrit by a conductivity measurement which is corrected for the
concentrations of conducting ions in the sample.
Materials:
- Syringes or capillaries containing heparinized arterial or
venous blood
Method:
- The conductivity is the ability of a solution to transmit
(conduct) electricity. The electrical current will increase in
proportion to the number of ions (or charged particles) found in a
solution, their electrical charge and mobility, i.e. how easily
the ions can move in the solution. The mobility of an ion in a
solution will also depend on how many cells (and size and shape)
are suspended in the solution.
- Both erythrocytes and plasma have characteristic
electrophysical properties. The membrane of the erythrocytes is
electrically insulating, mainly due to its content of lipids, so
that it appears essentially non-conducting.
- Plasma is fairly conductive due to its content of electrolytes
and charged proteins; the major contributor to plasma conductivity
is Na+, the concentration in human blood plasma being approx. 140
mmol/L.
- Due to this, there is an inverse relationship between the
electrical conductance and the hematocrit in blood when the
concentration of the charged particles is taken into account.
Three factors besides the number of RBCs are critical for the
determination of the hematocrit value when using a method based on
measurement of electrical conductivity:
- Electrolytes
- Temperature
- Proteins
Most blood gas analyzers allow for these variables as follows:
- Concentration of electrolytes: This is determined by one or
more ion measurements. As sodium is the primary electrolyte in
plasma, this is the most important ion to measure and use in the
calculation of hematocrit.
- A change in the temperature has a significant impact on the
conductivity because blood has a high temperature coefficient. The
measuring chamber in blood gas analyzers is thermostatted and the
blood sample preheated prior to measurement; thus there is no
contribution from changing temperature.
- The protein concentration in plasma is assumed constant in
healthy people, so a constant compensation for this is
incorporated in the calculation of hematocrit on blood gas
analyzers.
Limitations:
- In patients with abnormal plasma osmolality, e.g. patients
being treated with plasma expanders, blood diluents or massive
infusion therapy, the protein concentration is no longer constant
and the hematocrit determination gives falsely low values [8, 9].
Some blood gas analyzers offer correction for this bias
[10,11,12]. See also Table I.
4. Calculation of hematocrit from hemoglobin
As there is a linear relationship between hemoglobin (ctHb)
and hematocrit as described earlier, it is possible to calculate the
hematocrit on analyzers that measure hemoglobin. When making this
conversion, two factors should be taken into consideration:
- The analytical quality of the ctHb measurement
- The precision of the equation that converts the two parameters
The measurement of ctHb from most good-quality analyzers
is usually reliable; however, the equations used to calculate the
hematocrit vary from analyzer to analyzer. Some analyzers use an
empirically found equation [2,13] whereas others use an approximate
conversion factor of 3 [14,15].
Example:
Hb
concentration
(g/dL) |
Conversion equation |
Hct % |
Reference |
| 15* |
Hct (%) =
(0.0485 × ctHb (mmol/L) + 0.0083) × 100 |
45.98 |
[2] |
| 15 |
Hct (%) = 2.8 ×
ctHb (g/dL) + 0.8 |
42.80 |
[13] |
| 15 |
Hct (%) = ctHb
(g/dL) / 0.34 |
44.12 |
[16] |
| 15 |
Hct (%) = 2.941
× ctHb (g/dL) |
44.12 |
[14,15] |
TABLE I: Effect of different conversion factors on Hct %.
* Conversion factor: g/dL × 0.62058 = mmol/L
Limitations:
- It is generally assumed that the conversion from hemoglobin to
hematocrit is straightforward since most methods measuring ctHb
are considered to be fairly accurate; however, different analyzers
use different conversion factors, which may compromise the
reliability of the hematocrit result. Hematocrit and hemoglobin
are often used interchangeably; however, different studies have
shown that the two parameters are not comparable, but that they
have their separate applications [15,17,18,19].
Comparing measuring technologies
All measuring technologies for determining hematocrit have
advantages and disadvantages. The following table provides an easy
overview of the described methods. The advantages/disadvantages
listed have all been found by reviewing the literature, i.e. no
prioritizing according to importance has been done.
| Method |
Advantages |
|
Microhematocrit |
- Small sample volume
- Relatively fast analysis
- Hemolysis detected when result is read
- No dilution needed
|
| Complete
blood cell count |
- Hct parameter together with other hematology parameters –
only one blood sample is necessary
- Dilution of sample removes problems with hyperosmotic
samples
- No preparation needed
- No manual dilution needed
|
|
Conductivity |
- Small sample volume
- Short turnaround time
- Hct parameter together with blood gas, pH, electrolytes,
and metabolites – only one blood sample is necessary
- No preparation needed
- No dilution needed
- Suitable for POCT
|
|
Calculation from ctHb |
- Hct parameter together with other parameters – only one
blood sample is necessary
- Some methods are suitable for POCT
|
TABLE IIa. Advantages of different methods of measuring
hematocrit.
| Method |
Disadvantages |
|
Microhematocrit |
- Time-consuming and careful preparation required (sealing
of capillaries, etc)
- Uncertain manual reading of the ratio
- Leakage of sealing gives falsely low results (more RBCs
will be lost than plasma) [5]
- Falsely high Hct readings caused by trapped plasma. In
normal blood 1.5-3.0 % [5]
- In blood with abnormally sized or shaped RBCs, more plasma
will be trapped, causing a higher positive bias of Hct
- Excess EDTA (inadequate blood for the fixed amount of EDTA
in the tube) will cause cell shrinkage and falsely lower the
Hct [5]
- Clots will lead to false packing of the cells, giving
falsely high results [5]
- Hemolysis will destroy the cell walls and lead to false
packing of the cells, giving falsely low results [5]
- Acute hyperosmotic conditions will change the cell volume
and lead to a false packing of the cells, giving falsely low
results [9]
|
| Complete
blood cell count |
- Elevated reticulocyte or WBC count results in falsely high
hematocrit values because these cells will be counted as RBCs
[7]
- Autoagglutination, where two or more cells are counted as
one, will lead to falsely low results [7]
- Hemolysis will destroy the cell walls, giving falsely low
results [7]
- A decreased level of MCV due to microcytosis will lead to
falsely low Hct results, as the RBCs may be recognized as
leucocytes [7]
- In patients with abnormal osmolality, the addition of an
isotonic solution may increase the MCV, leading to falsely
elevated Hct readings
- Careful sample handling is required, especially careful
sample mixing, to avoid false readings
|
|
Conductivity |
- Acute hyperosmotic conditions will lead to cell shrinkage
as water moves out of the cells to equalize the osmotic
pressure. This will result in falsely low results similar to
the microhematocrit method [9].
- Variations in protein concentration in plasma, e.g. in
patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass where plasma
dilution with protein-free electrolyte solution is necessary,
will affect the Hct significantly [8,9]. Some analyzers offer
correction for this bias [10,11,12].
- Arterial blood has approx. 2 % higher Hct than venous
blood [7]
- Only heparinized blood can be used [20]
- Attention must be paid to sample handling, specifically
proper mixing of the sample, to avoid false readings
|
|
Calculation from ctHb |
- Deviation of MCHC from the standard value, e.g. in
children, will affect the calculated hematocrit [20]
- Hyperlipemic plasma may falsely elevate the hemoglobin
[21]
- An extremely high number of WBCs may falsely elevate the
hemoglobin [21]
- Inadequate hemolyzation or mixing of the sample will
falsely decrease the hemoglobin [22]
- Uncertainty in calculation algorithm
|
TABLE IIb. Disadvantages of different methods of
measuring hematocrit.
Discussion
When hematocrit is used to assess anemia and the oxygen-carrying
capacity, the advantages and disadvantages of each method must be
carefully considered. In addition, the specific clinical and
analytical needs for any patient population must be determined.
Hematocrit is traditionally a routine hematology laboratory
parameter; however, measuring hematocrit as a STAT parameter in a
POC setting is in many ways preferable, as this will save time in
critical situations and avoid specimen transport problems. Some
blood gas analyzers offer this possibility, either by measuring
hematocrit by conductivity or by calculating hematocrit from ctHb.
Hemoglobin is also used to assess anemia both in the laboratory
and as a STAT parameter on POCT analyzers. Different hemoglobin
measuring methods and their applications will be discussed in
another article.
Conclusion
Both POCT and traditional laboratory methods of measuring or
calculating hematocrit have limitations. Methods used outside of the
laboratory must be intuitive for users without time-consuming sample
handling. Methods suitable for an adult environment may not be
suitable for a neonatal environment due to sample volume
limitations. Some methods are not suitable in certain applications
due to e.g. problems associated with volume expansion fluids or
abnormally sized or shaped red blood cells. These limitations can
have important clinical implications and must be carefully
considered as described in this article.
References
- Soldin SJ, Rifai N, Hicks JMB. Biochemical Basis of Pediatric
Disease. Second ed. Washington DC: AACC Press, 1995: 5.
- Kokholm G. Simultaneous measurements of blood pH, pCO2,
pO2 and concentrations of hemoglobin and its
derivatives – a multicenter study. Radiometer publication AS107.
Copenhagen: Radiometer Medical A/S, 1991.
-
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/encyclopedia.html Medline
Plus encyclopedia
- Bull BS, Koepke JA, Simson E et al. Procedure for
determining packed cell volume by the hematocrit method. Third
edition. NCCLS publication H7-A3. Wayne, Pennsylvania: NCCLS,
2000.
- Linné JJ, Ringsrud KM. Clinical Laboratory Science, the Basics
and Routine Techniques. Fourth edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby,
1999: 279-95.
-
http://www.beckman.com/products/instrument/
partchar/technology/coulterprinciple.asp
- Thomas L. Hematocrit (HCT). In: Thomas L, ed. Clinical
laboratory diagnostics, use and assessment of clinical laboratory
results. Frankfurt/Main: TH-Books-Verl.-Ges., 1998: 479-82.
- Known interfering substances. In: ABL555 OM. Ed. 0212F.
Brønshøj: Radiometer Medical A/S, 2002: Chapter 1, 1-5. Code no.
989-289.
- Stott RAW, Hortin GL, Wilhite TR et al. Analytical
artifacts in hematocrit measurements by whole-blood chemistry
analyzers. Clin Chem 1995; 41, 2: 306-11.
- User-defined corrections. In: BG, Oxi, Lyte and Metabolite
Systems RM. Ed. M. Brønshøj: Radiometer Medical A/S, 1999: Chapter
1.8, 6-7. Code no. 985-787.
- Correlation. In: ABL77 OM. Ed. K. Brønshøj: Radiometer Medical
A/S, 2002: Chapter 5, 23. Code no. 989-555.
- Krarup T, Walcker KS. Guideline to measurement on the ABL555
using the user-specified fluid mode. Radiometer publication
Bulletin No. 6-1998. Brønshøj: Radiometer Medical A/S, 1998.
- O’Connor G, Molloy AM, Daly L. Deriving a useful packed cell
volume estimate from haemoglobin analysis. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47:
78-79.
- Weatherall MS, Sherry KM. An evaluation of the Spuncrit™
infra-red analyzer for measurement of haematocrit. Clin Lab Haem
1997; 19: 183-86.
- Sorell-Rashi LA, Tomasic M. Evaluation of automated methods of
measuring hemoglobin and hematocrit in horses. AJVR 1998; 59, 12:
1519-22.
-
http://www.i-stat.com/products/ctisheets/714178-14d.pdf.
- Graitcer PL, Goldsby JB, Nichaman MZ. Hemoglobins and
hematocrits: are they equally sensitive in detecting anemias? Am J
Clin Nutr 1981; 34, 1: 61-64.
- Young PC, Hamill , Wasserman RC. Evaluation of the capillary
microhematocrit as a screening test for anemia in pediatric office
practice. PEDIATRICS 1986; 78, 2: 206-09.
- Celkan T, Gür E, Can G et al. Anemic or not? The
Türkish Journal of Pediatrics 2003; 45: 329-34.
- Performance characteristics. In: ABL700 Series RM. Ed. H.
Brønshøj: Radiometer Medical A/S, 2002: Chapter 5, 46-47. Code no.
989-312.
- Jacobs DS, Kasten BL Jr, Demott WR et al. Laboratory
Test Handbook. Second ed. Hudson, Cleveland: Lexi-comp inc, 1990:
490-91.
- Lock R, Francke K, Nötzli B. The whole-blood sampling
handbook. Brønshøj: Radiometer Medical A/S, 2000.
Reviewed by
Michael Peake
Flinders, Medical Centre
Adelaide, S.A.
Australia
Author
Gitte Wennecke
Radiometer Medical ApS
Åkandevej 21
DK-2800 Brønshøj
Denmark |